Answer:in my opinion some of the problems can be resolved by haing more markets be run by the country so that they can have proper insurance and so the taxtes help flow back into the country.
Explanation:if u have insurance what u lose u can at least get some back and the taxes help the countrys financial problems wich also help u.
D. third parties IS THE RIGHT CHOICE This is not a major contributing factor in party realignment.
Third parties bring important issues to the major parties' attention. They are also frequently used as cliffhangers in the elections in which they participate.
How do political parties work with the state and local governments to keep new parties from forming?
Election laws make it more difficult to appear on the ballot, and the Electoral College makes it more difficult for third parties to participate.
What are the benefits and pitfalls of partisan polarization?
Supportive: Gives voters a wide range of choices.
slightly negative: Moderates do not vote or take part in government, which exacerbates party controversy.
To know more about partisan polarization click here
brainly.com/question/29668776
#SPJ4
Answer:
No because it violated the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:
As you may already know, the states that make up the US have the autonomy to formulate their own legislation that must be obeyed within state boundaries. However, even with its own legislation, each state is subject to federal laws, which must be obeyed by all. There is a federal law that prohibits states from violating trade clauses, so state laws should be made so as not to violate that federal law, for example.
There was no federal law dealing with truck mud flaps, so the state of Illinois decided to create its own legislation that required trucks to move around the state to use curved mud flaps because it guaranteed road safety. Although the state of Illinois intended to be good and there was no federal law barring that law, the state of Illinois violated a trade clause by preventing trucks from other states from unloading goods to local trade. For this reason, we can say that the statute formulated by the state of Illinois was not constitutional because it violated a federal clause.
It’s fun , I love using it to check for the correct answers and see if anyone thinks like me
Answer:
The difference between a revocable and irrevocable trust would be; A revocable living trust becomes irrevocable when the grantor dies because he's no longer available to make changes to it. But a revocable trust can be designed to break into separate irrevocable trusts at the time of the grantor's death for the benefit of children or other beneficiaries.
