Answer:
a. verify that your observations are correct
c. think about what else might cause the observed discrepancy
Explanation:
Let's begin by explaining that a law is an affirmation (something established) based on repeated long-term observation of a phenomenon that has been studied and verified.
That is: A law is present in all known theories and therefore is considered universal. In addition, <u>a law can not be refuted, nor changed, because its precepts have been proven through various studies.</u>
Then, based on what is explained above, Kepler's laws of planetary motion exist because they were rigorously tested and verified, therefore they can not be refuted.
So, if we have a small discrepancy between the predicted and actual positions of Uranus after using Kepler's laws, we have to verify carefully our observations again and search what might be causing that discrepancy. But we cannot assume Kepler's Laws are incorrecto or need modifications.
In addition, we cannot consider that Uranus may not be a planet, because the discrepancy is small. In fact, this discrepancy lead to the discovery of another planet, Neptune.
The correct answer is letter A. red. Young red stars would most likely be found in a giant molecular cloud. Red stars<span> are cooler than the sun, with surface temperatures of 3,500 K for a bright red star</span>
<span>c. a hot tub full of hot water</span>
Answer:
The kinetic energy of the car at the top of the hill is 140280 Joules.
Explanation:
Mass of the car, m = 620 kg
Speed of the car, v = 24 m/s
Height of the hill, h = 30 m
The engine can produce up to 144,000 J of work during that time, W = 144,000 J
We need to find the kinetic energy of the car at the top of the hill. It can be calculated using conservation of mechanical energy as :




So, the kinetic energy of the car at the top of the hill is 140280 Joules. Hence, this is the required solution.