The biological risk for the first person than the second as a result of radiation weighting is 10 times.
<h3>
What is radiation weighting factor?</h3>
As stated in the question, radiation weighting factor (q) is the ability to transfer energy to the body.
If radiation factor of proton = 2, and radiation factor of alpha particles = 20.
- First person is exposed to alpha radiation = 20
- Second person is exposed to protons = 2
Risk of first person with respect to second person = 20/2 = 10 times higher
Learn more about radiation factor here: brainly.com/question/24039736
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct option is C.
Explanation:
Carbohydrates are one of the macro molecules that are consumed by living organisms. The end product of carbohydrate is glucose. Glucose is a very important fuel that the body cells used to produce energy, which they use to carry out their daily activities. Glucose is also known as blood sugar and it is the only fuel that living cells can use for the production of ATP. Other food macro molecules such as lipids and proteins can also be converted to glucose if there is a need for that. Glucose is always stored in the body in form of glycogen.
The statement given in option C about glucose is wrong because glucose is a monosaccharide and not a disaccharide.
The equilibrium constant, k of the reaction in which case, the concentrations of the given reactants and products are as indicated is; Choice A; K = 3.1 x 10⁵
<h3>What is the equilibrium constant , k of the reaction as described in the task content?</h3>
It follows from above that the concentrations of the reactants and products are as follows; [H2] = 0.10 M, [N2] = 0.10 M, and [NH3] = 5.6 M at equilibrium.
Hence, the equilibrium constant of the reaction in discuss is;
K = [5.6]²/[0.10]³[0.10]
k = 5.6² × 10⁴
k = 3.136 × 10⁵
K = 3.1 × 10⁵.
Read more on equilibrium constant;
brainly.com/question/1619133
#SPJ1
Answer:
Carbonic acid could be formed.
Explanation:
Hello,
Based on her claim, it would be a really useful strategy to prevent global warming, nevertheless, there would be a problem if a increasing amount of carbon dioxide is not buried at the bottom of the ocean yet it flows freely along the sea and probably reacting with the water, causing carbonic acid to be formed and subsequently cutting back the sea's pH (increasing its acidity).
It would be useful, but a constant monitoring of the sea's pH must be needed because this could cause some species to be affected not only by the temperature but for the acid pH as well.
Best regards.
