This document tells me that the separation of different types of groups was starting to develop that the 1800 had many conflicts based on social problems and cultural/group dilemmas<span />
Answer:
Create a point system.
Explanation:
If there was a point system included for days the younger students independently read at home, it would help motivate them. They would gain in two ways: reading more, and gaining points. At the end there could be some sort of prizes such as toys or mini coupons.
As Adele could only remember the items from the end of the list, this is an example of the recency effect.
In the field of psychology, the recency effect can be described as an effect in which a person is able to only remember recent memories and forget the older ones.
According to the recency effect, such items or things that occurred last are remembered whereas the other ones are forgotten.
In the scenario mentioned in the question, Adele manages to remember those items that were at the end of the list from the things he had to buy from the grocery store but he forgets those items that were in the beginning hence this is an example of the recency effect.
To learn about the recency effect, click here:
brainly.com/question/8653544
#SPJ4
Some criticisms that have been leveled at psychodynamic theories of personality are the reliance on early childhood familial experiences that come up later in life and too much emphasis on explaining how sexuality messes with behaviors.
Answer:
Elections affect the Supreme Court like this:
When a president is elected in the US, they are most likely to be of one political party or another. The president also appoints a Supreme Court Justice. If a president is considering appointing a judge, they will probably appoint someone who shares their views, so as to sway matters that get taken to the Supreme Court in their favor.
Explanation:
Example, because I'm not sure I explained correctly: If a president is more left-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree with isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge. t-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge.
