The contract between Timmy and Jennifer is not valid for legal claims because there are no ways to prove the terms they agreed to for the sale/purchase of the car.
<h3>What is a valid contract?</h3>
When we enter into an agreement with another person to carry out any commercial activity, we generally must create a document in which all the terms and conditions of the contract are established in order to bind both parties to comply with the contract.
If another type of contract is made, for example by telephone, spoken or other modality that does not have ways of verifying what was agreed, it can be considered as invalid contracts.
Based on the above, the contract that Jennifer made with Timmy over the phone is invalid because there is no way to check what they agreed to.
Learn more about contracts in: brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ1
<span>Retired people will be draining the U.S. economy of wealth. This is due to the quality of workers that are in the current generations to keep contributing to the Social Security System. Social security checks is given back to those who have paid in their contributions and have since retired. To keep funds available for more generations, those currently working need to contribute to the system as well. However, that is getting harder for the current generations to keep up with by either not working or not paying taxes. </span>
Customer spread sheet that is made on excel
Answer:
The correct answer is:
$3,500 (b.)
Explanation:
Compensatory damages are money paid to the plaintiff, to pay for losses incurred, injury or damages by negligence or unlawful conduct of the defendant in a civil court case. Before these compensations can be paid, the plaintiff has to prove in amount, the losses incurred and that these losses are directly related to the activity of the other party. Since the amount lost due to the choosing of the failed contract is $3,500, the plaintiff can file a suit for the compensation of the same amount.
On another hand, punitive damage may be compensation that is over and above the losses incurred by the plaintiff, and this is aimed mainly to provide an incentive against the repetition of such acts that caused the plaintiff such losses.
