Answer:
He will be less likely to spend on scones.
Explanation:
Understanding the spending pattern requires to understand the factors involving in purchasing.
- Income: Some people live tightly, and for that they have to cut down their expenditures and that affects their spending. Jose will not have much issues although buying scones because they will not be expensive, so this relationship is negative.
- Substitution: This will probably affect the the spending of Jones on scones because he used to buy both together, and if he stops spending on coffee he will not buy scones as well.
Answer:
increase by 400 billion dollars
Explanation:
marginal propensity to consume = mpc
tax multiplier = -mpc/1-mpc
from our question we were given mpc to be 0.8
-0.8/1-0.8
= -0.8/0.2
= -4
change in output = -4(-100)
= 400 billion dollars
for a $100 tax decrease, output will increase by $100 billion x 4
= $400 billion
The shareholder equity is equal to:
$28/share * 13 700 shares = $ 383,600
This is the total capital of Davidson International. Now, assuming that there is no additional income since it is not implied in the problem, the total equity does not change. However, the shares become: 13,700 + 500 = 14 200 shares.
Price per share now becomes:
$383 600 / 14 200 shares = $27/share
Answer:
The company should make the bicycle seats.
Explanation:
Given:
Number of seats to be made = 10,000
Variable cost = 80,000
Fixed cost = 10,000
Outside source cost for seats = $ 8.50 per seat
Since, the fixed cost of the seats cannot be eliminated. Therefore, the deciding factor will only be the variable cost.
Thus,
contribution margin per unit seat if made by own
= ( Variable cost / Number of seats )
Or
= 80,000 / 10,000
or
= $ 8
now,
the making the seats by own is $ 0.5 cheaper.
Hence, the company should make the bicycle seats.
