Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Complete Question:
Chapter 6, Section 1-D, Exercise 009 Is a Normal Distribution Appropriate? In each case below, is the sample size large enough so that the sample proportions follow a normal distribution?
a) n=600 p=0.2
b) n=20, p=0.4
if np=10 and npq=10 then the data follows normal distribution
a) np= 120,
q= 1-0.2= 0.8
npq= 600 ×0.2×0.4 = 48
Normal distribution is appropriate and sample size is large enough
b) np= 8
q= 1-0.4= 0.6
npq= 20 × 0.4×0.6= 4.8
sample size is not large enough so normal distribution is not appropriate.

<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
For a better understanding of the problem I've built up two triangles from the given triangular shape. So these two triangles are similar. Therefore, we can solve this problem by using ratios and corresponding sides in this way:

But our goal is to find y. Let's call w the height of the small triangle, then:

Applying the concept of ratios again:

<h2>Learn more:</h2>
Right triangle: brainly.com/question/10684799
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
36 cm^2
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Small</u><u> </u><u>window</u>
Length: 2cm
Width: 2cm
<u>Area</u><u>:</u> 4 cm^2
<u>Big window</u>
Length: 4cm
Width: 3cm
<u>Area</u><u>:</u> 12 cm^2
Total area of the windows:
(Area of 4 small windows + area of 1 big window)
(4 cm^2 x 4 + 12cm^2)
= <u>28 cm^2</u>
<u>Above</u><u> </u><u>window</u><u> </u><u>(</u><u>approx</u><u>.</u><u>)</u>
<u>Rectangle</u>
Length: 3cm
Width: 2cm
<u>Area</u><u>:</u> 6 cm^2
<u>T</u><u>riangle</u>
Base: 1cm
Height: 1cm
<u>Area</u><u>:</u> 2 x 0.5 cm^2 = 1 cm^2
<u>Square</u><u> </u><u>(</u><u>between</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>triangles</u><u>)</u>
Length: 1cm
Width: 1cm
<u>Area</u><u>:</u> 1 cm^2
= 8 cm^2
<u>TOTAL</u><u> </u><u>AREA</u><u> </u><u>OF</u><u> </u><u>ALL</u><u> </u><u>WINDOWS</u>
= AREA OF 4 WINDOWS + AREA OF BIG WINDOW + AREA OF ABOVE WINDOW
= 16 cm^2 + 12 cm^2 + 8 cm^2
<h3>
= <u>
36 cm^2</u></h3>
<em>I</em><em> </em><em>hope</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em> </em><em>made</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>explanations</em><em> </em><em>clear</em><em> </em><em>enough</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>make</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>easier</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>you</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>understand</em><em>!</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
your don't see what went wrong ?
Tyrell worked on
16 - 2(4 + 3x)
what do brackets mean ? they mean that this operation has to be done before everything else in the expression.
as this contains a variable, we cannot fully calculate it, true, but we need to keep this in mind and always treat the content of the brackets as one package.
so, whatever I do from the outside with one part of that package, I have to do also with all the other parts of that package.
so, the multiplication with -2 has to happen with both : 4 and 3x. not just with 4.
therefore, the correct simplification looks like
16 - 8 - 6x
8 - 6x or -6x + 8
Amelia multiplied correctly, but then made a mistake summing things up
10x - 3(4x + 1)
10x - 12x - 3
10x - 12x = -2x
I can't mix the pure constant -3 into the factors of x. that would be like the famous mixing of apples and oranges.
so, the result is
-2x - 3