All categories

4 years ago

2.10 grater than 2.09 true or false

Mathematics

2 answers:

shepuryov [24]4 years ago

5 0

Answer:

2.10 is greater than 2.09

Step-by-step explanation:

because 2.10 has more equation than 2.09

balandron [24]4 years ago

3 0

Answer:

2.10 is GREATER than 2.09 so **TRUE**

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps </3

You might be interested in

2% Of 144.4 is what is what

nevsk [136]

2% of 144.4 would be 2.888 repeating of course

3 0

3 years ago

The length of a rectangle is 5 inches more than the width. the perimeter is 30 inches. find the length and the width

xeze [42]

Answer:

Length = 10 inches

Width = 5 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

p = 2w + 2l

l = w + 5

30 = (2w + 2(w + 5))

30 = 4w + 10

20 = 4w

w = 5

l = w + 5

= 5 + 5

= 10

6 0

2 years ago

There are 216 people voting on the bill 3/8 of the people voted yes on the bill How many people voted yes

larisa86 [58]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

total number of people voting = 216

number of people who voted yes = $216(\frac{3}{8})$

= $81$

5 0

3 years ago

Each algorithm is applied to a group of 52 sample problems. The new algorithm completes the sample problems with a mean time of

dem82 [27]

Answer:

Therefore we fail to reject the Null hypothesis $H_0$

Because the is no sufficient evidence to support the claim of the alternative hypothesis $H_a$

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

Sample size $n_1 =52$

Mean time 1 $\=x_1=24.04\ hours$

Mean time 2 $\=x_2=24.52\ hours$

Standard deviation $\partial _1=5.769$

Standard deviation $\partial _2=5.556$

Level of significance 0.05

The null hypothesis is $H_o: \mu_1=\mu_2$

Alternative hypothesis $H_a: \mu_1$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

$Z= \frac{\=x_1-\=x_2}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}+\frac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}}}$

$Z= \frac{24.04-24.52}{\sqrt{\frac{5.769^2}{52}+\frac{5.5562^2}{52}}}$

$Z= -0.4321583379$

$Z= -0.43$

From Table the Z-critical value at $\alpha =0.05\ is\ -1.6449$

Therefore

Zcal> Zcritical

(-0.43)=(-1.645)

Generally we fail to reject the null hypothesis $H_0$ at $\alpha = 0.05$

Therefore we fail to reject the $H_0$

Because the is no sufficient evidence to support the claim of $H_a$

5 0

3 years ago

Please help fasttt!!

gogolik [260]

Answer:

then u help me

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers