Answer:
The correct answer is - option B. Whether the Twitter user provided #SorrySorrySorry (for the sincere condition), #SorryNotSorry (for the insincere condition), or #WhatsDoneIsDone (for the no apology condition).
Explanation:
An independent variable is a variable in any experiment is that leads to the changes to the dependent variable. The independent variables are subject to change to know what changes occur to the experiment.
The independent variables are stand-alone in specific conditions and would not change by the other variables the investigator tries to analyze. In this case, the Twitter user provided three different hashtags for three different conditions.
Answer:
Social classes and urbanization would be the answer to this question.
Answer:
The container analogy is too static.
Explanation:
The WM or the Working memory may be defined as a cognitive system with some limited capacity which can hold information for a short period of time or temporarily. Working memory is very important for reasoning and also the guidance of the decision-making as well as behavior.
In the cognitive system, the recent effect is always associated with the working memory.
Working memory is always associated with the storage container which can store memories for short time. But this analogy is very much static as the working memory can more capable than simply the short term storage.
Advantages of society: Discipline - it comes forward when order needs to be in place, people are able to incorporate discipline as accountability for action. Formation or Order - compromise and healthy conversation and agreement form for each member to get what they want and experience what they need.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
