Answer:
zero
Explanation:
The activity in this scenario is fund raising/ issue note to a bank which is booked in financing activities, not in operating activities.
Thus we can said "there's no operating activity in Madison Company cash flow of 2016" if there's no other information.
Answer: in pic
explanation: found here https://environmental-conscience.com/being-a-consultant-pros-cons/
Answer:
FV= $6,124.46
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
You plan to save $1,400 for the next four years, beginning now, to pay for a vacation. If you can invest it at 6 percent annually,
Annual deposit= $1,400
Number of periods= 4 years
Interest rate= 6%
<u>To calculate the future value, we need to use the following formula:</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
FV= {1,400*[(1.06^4) - 1]} / 0.06
FV= $6,124.46
Answer:
It represents the Integration stage
Explanation:
Money laundering is an illegal chain of activities done by individuals or corporate bodies to change the status of money gotten through a criminal activity into legitimate money. This chain of activities starts with the Placement stage then transforms into the Layering stage, then ends when it is already integrated into the legitimate financial system through the Integration stage.
After the money launderer conceals the illegal money through bank deposits or purchasing a life insurance policy at the Placement stage, the launderer then proceeds to further break the money into smaller amounts to evade suspicion by numerous transactions and bank deposits at the Layering stage, which is then ended by partial or whole surrenders of life insurance policies to make it now legitimate money.
When comparing Mexico to Scotland, you would expect Scottish workers to have greater productivity and higher labour cost per worker
Explanation:
One may expect that a Scotland plant will be less labour intensive and efficient per worker than just Mexican facilities as a more advanced technological nation and that "higher productivity and low labour cost" will be the right answer.
Both possibilities for lower productivity can be excluded as they demonstrate lower productivity. "Higher productivity, but less energy per job" is not the solution because it recognises lower labour costs per worker rather than higher.
The increase in labour productivity relies, according to certain studies, on three key factors: innovation and capital goods saving, modern technology and human capital.
