Answer:
c. Travis earns a higher rate of return than Alicia.
Explanation:
Both investments are worth $2,400.
Alicia's rate of of return is given by:
Travis' rate of return is given by:
Alicia's investment had a rate of return of roughly 10.3% while Travis' investment had a rate of return of about 13.0%.
Therefore, the we can conclude that c. Travis earns a higher rate of return than Alicia.
Answer: No, it would not be a better idea
Explanation:
If Ms. Torti argued that she was providing medical assistance, then the Law would protect Ms. Torti’s immunity. But, had the questioned would have arose if Ms. Torti was medically trained or she was aware that it needs medically trained personnel to provide such care at a scene of emergency. This would be a direct attack on the defendant’s cause. I do not think that it would have been a better idea.
Answer:
Less; more; more.
Explanation:
Depreciation can be defined as a process in which the monetary or financial value with respect to an asset decrease or falls over time as a result of wear and tear.
This ultimately implies that, depreciation is a process which typically involves the general fall in the value of an asset such as currency, plant equipment or machinery etc over a specific period of time.
Basically, in a floating exchange rate system, a fall or decline in the value of a currency with respect to another currency is generally referred to as currency depreciation.
As the dollar price of a foreign currency (for example, dollars per yen) decreases, foreign goods will be less expensive, more foreign goods will be purchased, and more foreign currency will be demanded.
<em>Hence, if the currency of a foreign country is depreciating, this should stimulate import (more foreign goods will be purchased) because these foreign goods will become relatively less expensive as a result of a fall or decline in the currency and vice versa. </em>
Answer:
go to settings on tik tok, and just click on the person u wanna banned
Answer:
The most likely outcome would be that Lois will still have to sell Stew the house
Explanation:
The most likely outcome would be that Lois will still have to sell Stew the house. This is mainly because Lois accepted Stew's offer of $100,000 and Stew already fulfilled part of the agreement. By simply paying the $10,000 that he left Stew he has already fulfilled part of his side of the agreement which solidifies the agreement and makes it legally binding. Therefore, he would most likely win a court case if Lois decides to back out of the agreement.