In this case, I would consider the situation that James faces here to be a very common situation between bosses and their employees.
<h3>How the
company should have
handled the situation</h3>
1. The issue that James faces with the company is a common situation that workers face in the hands of their bosses. They are transferred from place to place and in a bid to keep their jobs, they go without complaints. The company should have been able to keep to its initial agreement with him. But we can see that not properly addressing his concerns would make them lose him. The company should have made open their demands to him in the first place.
2. In this case, the company has to be held responsible if James decides to leave. This is because they have not tried to keep to their word and they have not tried in any way to do things that would pacify James either. His requests are not taken seriously.
3. Due to the fact that I take integrity and words seriously, I would leave the company to a competitor because I would find it difficult to continue working in an environment were I have to give my all and still be unheard.
Read more on management teams here:
brainly.com/question/14069240
#SPJ1
Net income = Total revenues — Total expenses
Answer:
C. Evaluate and motivate workers
Explanation:
This is the taks for middle mamagement.
Answer:
B. $275,000
Explanation:
The second machine will be depreciate over time as it can later be used for operational purposes or another research projects. The first, as can only be used for a research project It should be considered expenses for the entire amount regardless of the useful life.
Machine B useful life 10 years
depreciation expense: cost / useful life
250,000 / 10 = 25,000
machine A 250,000 + 25,000 depreciation for machine B = 275,000 total
