All categories

4 years ago

Match each of the definitions that follow with the term it defines.

Business

1 answer:

AleksandrR [38]4 years ago

4 0

Answer: The answers are:

1) Engieering change order is a document that initiates a product or process change.

2) Total cost concept Includes manufacturing costs plus selling and administrative expenses.

3) Variable cost concept = Variable manufacturing costs plus variable selling and administrative costs are included in cost per unit .

4) Normal selling price is Target selling price to be achieved in the long term .

5) Setup = Changing tooling when preparing for a new product.

You might be interested in

Sydney has worked for WillCo for the last 20 years. She just had her 60th birthday and is thinking about retirement. WillCo spon

Wittaler [7]

Answer: c. Sydney can diversify 50% of her WillCo stock.

Explanation:

Employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) is simply referred to as an employee benefit where the employees of a particular company are given ownership interest as long as some certain criteria are met.

Once the workers become qualified participants, they can diversify certain percentage of their stocks. From the 1st-5th year, a qualified participant is allowed to diversify about 25% of his or her stock account and about 50% in the 6th year.

Based on the explanation, since Sydney has worked for WillCo for the last 20 years, Sydney can diversify 50% of her WillCo stock.

5 0

3 years ago

Why is gdp an imperfect measurement of total production in the economy?

ra1l [238]

First of all, GDP does not include household production, production from the underground economy, intermadiate goods or intermediate servces. That is because we define GDP to be the total of all market values of all final goods and services in the country. Hence, the correct answer by the above definition cannot be d. The point of that definition is that household products cannot have a market value and that if we counted towards the GDP both the value of a Graphics Card and that of the PC, we would double count the value of the Graphics Card, thus overestimating the GDP. We see that the value of new houses are included in GDP since they need materials and services and they have a market value, so b is also excluded. Finally, we have shown that b is true but that this is a good thing and leads to a better estimate of total production; the correct answer is a. Here is an example. If there is an economy where in every house there is plenty of wood and people make wood dolls out of tradition, these dolls will not have a market value if they are kept by the people who made them. Nonetheless they are products too and everyone could just try to sell them the next day at a reasonable price; then, the GDP would get a bump out of nowhere, because it cannot account for household items or the underground economy.

8 0

3 years ago

Elite Stationary employs 20 full-time employees and 10 trainees. Direct and indirect costs are applied on a professional labor

kolezko [41]

Answer:

Since cost per hour of full-time employees is $150, while cost per hour of trainees $27, clients using proportionately more full-time employees than trainees will be under billed or charged for the resources or labor hour used.

Explanation:

The data in the question are merged and they are first separated before answering the question as follows:

Details Budget Actual

Indirect costs $250,000 $400,000

Annual salary of each employee $200,000 $250,000

Annual salary of each trainee $40,000 $45,000

Total professional labor-hours 40,000 dlh 50,000 dlh

In normal costing system, actual costs are used.

Therefore, labor hours for each category and cost per hour can be calculated as follows:

Full-time employees total labor hours = (20/30) * 50,000 = 33,333 hours

Each full-time employee annual labor hour = 33,333/20 = 1,667 hours

Cost per hour of full-time employees = $250,000/1,667 = $150 per hour

Trainee total labor hours = (10/30) * 50,000 = 16,667 hours

Each trainee annual labor hours = 16,667/10 = 1,667 hours

Cost per hour of trainees = $45,000/1,667 = $27 per hour

5 0

3 years ago

On December 29, 2005, BJ Co. sold an equity security investment that had been purchased on January 4, 2004. BJ owned no other ma

sineoko [7]

Answer:

AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery

No No

The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.

The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.

The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.

For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

You purchased a share of stock for $53. One year later you received $3.00 as dividend and sold the share for $52. Your holding-p

GalinKa [24]

Answer:

the holding period return is 3.77%

Explanation:

The computation of the holding period return is shown below:

Holding period return is

= (Income + (Selling price - Purchase price)) ÷ Purchase price

= ($3 + ($52 - $53)) ÷ 53

= 3.77%

Hence, the holding period return is 3.77%

We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come

And, the same is to be considered

3 0

3 years ago