A human life is so valuable that no single price should be placed on it. The effect on this stance on bioethical issues however, is relative.
<h3>Relativity of Human value to Bioethical issues</h3>
- A person's stance on a bioethical issue can be based on which human life they value more, the person that will gain, or the one that will be affected.
- With abortion, one might argue that the value of the mother is higher than the baby's because not having to take care of a child will give her a better life.
- Designer babies might be more valuable because their lower rate of birth defects mean that they are tougher and less expensive to maintain.
- Stem cell research could save many lives so more value might be placed on these lives than the embryos affected.
In conclusion, a person can see another life as valuable yet have relative views on bioethical issues.
Find out more on stem cell research at brainly.com/question/5409171.
Explanation:
Carrier proteins are proteins that carry substances from one side of a biological membrane to the other.
I can’t see the image but I would guess animals such as deer or horse or elephants or any large animal have the ability to run over the rocks and turn them to smaller sediments
The food chains make up the food webs
