Answer:
the marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost
Explanation:
In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the government decided to allocate more resources toward defense goods. The government's decision reflects their assessment that t<u>he marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost.</u>
In utility in economics, once the marginal benefits of buying an item outweighs the marginal cost of the item, you buy it. After the September 11, 2001 attack, the United States government found a need to increase the defense budget to prevent further attack. It can be concluded that the marginal benefit derived from increased defense spending outweighs the cost.
A client needs to be placed on strict intake and output (I&O) measurement. The nurse collects the data as a baseline and then checks the client's skin turgor by Pulling up and releasing the skin on the sternal area.
<h3>How do you test the turgor of the skin?</h3>
- By gently squeezing a skin fold between your thumb and fingers, you may determine the turgor of the skin.
- It is the typical condition of turgidity and tension in live cells, in particular: the fluid inside a plant cell stretching out the protoplasmic layer and cell wall.
- The skin you choose, whether it be on the belly, sternum, forearm, or below the collarbone, need to feel elastic, move freely, and swiftly revert to its initial position when released after a few seconds.
- Turgor was regarded as normal if it took less than two seconds for the skin to return to the hand and reduced if it took more than two seconds.
To learn more about skin, refer to the following link:
brainly.com/question/306377
#SPJ4
In the last decade of the 18th century, both France and England experienced revolutions. In France it was a political revolution against the Old Order, and in England it was an economic revolution that changed the way wealth was produced and shared.
Answer:
prevent them from interfering with state courts
Explanation:
- The constitution limits the jurisidiction of the federal court so as to prevent its interferance to state courts.
- Section two of article three of the constitution, defines the jurisidiction of the federal court in terms of its scope and the cases it can handle. This prevents a possible collision between the state and federal laws.
- The constitution,has been amended over time by the congress to limit the jurisdiction of the federal court.
It means that you have to be willing to be with your friends despite the busy schedule and give time to spend with them.
