The answer in the spaces provided above are the following;
conditioned stimulus and unconditioned stimulus.
It is because classical conditioning occurs when the
individual has perceived the conditioned stimulus when the unconditioned
stimulus has been affected by a neutral stimulus.
The conducted experiment of Horselenberg et al. (2003) is a replication of the Kassin and Kiechel (1996) findings. They used the classic computer crash paradigm wherein they falsely accused the participants of touching the forbidden keys and used a pseudo-eyewitness who insisted they saw the participants touched the forbidden keys. With all the variables they explored: individual difference in compliance, suggestibility, fantasy proneness, dissociation, and cognitive failures; their findings suggest that only fantasy proneness has a relationship with false confessions. The result of this experiment shows that false confessions really occur; and that it is easy to make the participants confess because of the pseudo-eyewitness as evidence that made them internalize they really had touched the forbidden keys that resulted to the computer crash.
Answer:
random assignment, a random sample
Explanation:
In an experiment which requires groups the groups are to be made sure that members of each group is selected at random. This is known as random assignment.
The selection of participants from a population randomly i.e., having no pattern is called random sampling and the sample is called random sample. The random sample is selected as such in order to be representative of the population.
