Differentiate between states covered under state plans and states covered under federal OSHA jurisdiction

1 answer:

7 0

State plans must be at least as effective as federal OSHA, but some states, such as California, have chosen to adopt stricter standards. In four of these locations (Connecticut, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and the Virgin Islands), the state plan covers public-sector workers only; private-sector employers are still covered by federal OSHA.

You might be interested in

Which statements are true about the California Safe surrender Law

anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

A.) Can drop off the baby at a hospital or fire station.

B.) Must leave your name/Identification information.

C.) Must surrender baby within 72 hours .

E.) As long as the newborn is surrendered safely, there is no prosecution.

Explanation:

The Safe Surrender Law or the Safely Surrendered Baby Law is a law that provides an alternative for any baby 'unwanted' or 'unable to be cared for' by the parents. This law is a result of the high rate of infant mortality and is created to prevent such deaths and save the babies from 'premature' death.

According to this law, a parent/ parents can drop off their babies in any designated location (most often hospitals and fire stations) within the first 72 hours from birth. At these places, the parents will be given identification bracelets similar to the baby for further use in case they want to reclaim the baby. Moreover, there are no legal repercussions or prosecution as long as the baby is surrendered safely.

Thus, the correct options are A, B, C, and E.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement is true based on the line graph ?

horsena [70]

I need a pictured the graph

3 0

3 years ago

HELP. BRAINIEST AND 20 POINTS.

nasty-shy [4]

Which of the following statements about MyPlate is TRUE? All of the above

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

a client with megaloblastic anemia reports mouth and tongue soreness. what instruction will the nurse give the client regarding

zvonat [6]

NO TASTING HYPERALERGY

7 0

1 year ago

Explain why this scenario represents an ethical dilemma or conflict. Situation: Paul, a social worker, met with a couple of budd

Alex73 [517]

Answer:

The correct answer is - a conflict between self-determination and the right to confidentiality.

Explanation:

An ethical dilemma is or conflict between two or more moral imperatives or principles in which not a single one is acceptable or preferable. In this scenario, Paul is in a conflict between self-determination as a social worker and the right to the confidentiality of his client and his problems.

If he prefers anyone the moral imperatives he will lose or harm his other moral value so it is an ethical conflict or dilemma.

4 0

3 years ago