Explanation:
in global business obligation plan more ideas
Answer:
Cost of equity = 10.7%
Explanation:
<em>We will work out the required rate of return using the the dividend valuation model. The model states that the value of a stock is the present value of the future divided discounted at the cost of equity.
</em>
The model is given below:
P = D× (1+g)/(r-g)
P- price of stock, D- dividend payable now, g- growth rate in dividend, r- cost of equity
So we substitute
130 = 5.50× (1+r)/(r-0.06)
cross multiplying
(r-0.06)× 130 = 5.50 × (1+r)
130 r- 7.8 = 5.50 + 5.50r
collecting like terms
130 r - 5.50r=5.50 + 7.8
124.5 r= 13.3
Divide both sides by 124.5
r =13.3 /124.5= 0.1068
r=0.1068 × 100= 10.7%
Cost of equity = 10.7%
Answer:
C. Confidentiality
Explanation:
Confidentiality involves actions taken to protect the clients or someone information from the public, this could be private informations, and it is in accordance to law of the land.
Therefore, from this question the principle of information security is Susan trying to enforce is Confidentiality.
The company would most probably be interested in early majority
.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Adopter categories split consumers into sections on the basis of their willingness to try out new innovations or products.
The categories of adopters had been first given the name and defined by social scientist Everett Rogers in 1962 in the famous book Propagation of Innovation.
Adopter categories as a concept for the propagation of the theory of creativity are extended to several studies, amongst others, marketing, administrative studies, management of information, communications and research of complexity.
Early majority: If this group joins an idea or some other innovation, it appears to be adopted by the public shortly. This group makes useful decisions and practical advantages over coolness.
Answer:
voidable title
Explanation:
A voidable title is considered good and valid title until voided.
For example, I purchase a PS4 from my nephew who is a minor and I sell it to my neighbor, and my neighbor purchased it on good faith. My nephew can decide to void the contract because he was a minor, but since I passed good title to my neighbor while the contract was valid, my neighbor doesn't have to return the PS4.
The difference with a void title is that a void title was never good and valid.
On the other hand, if I had stolen the PS4, I would never have good title over it, and I sell it to my neighbor. The rightful owner of the PS4 can claim it back and my neighbor must return it because the contract was void since I never had good title on the PS4.
