Answer: The contract contains a subsequent condition
Explanation:
A subsequent condition is defined as something that ends something else. In the legal context, this means that it ends legal obligations or rights. In the case of Don, if he finds a new job out of state his contract should be discharged since he will not be present to use it. In these cases, the subsequent condition is present since, although Don's condition was not to move out of the state for a new job, if he finds it, he must leave since he will not be there to go to the gym and will be paying for a service that not using.
Although it is true that contracts that are carried out legally have their conditions and must be taken to the letter, there are exceptions where, depending on the nature of a situation, it cannot be fulfilled.
Countries use various measures to gauge their wealth. Below we outline the top 10 countries based on disposable income per capita, identifying how much money a person has available to spend on goods and services after paying their taxes.
<h3>Money per capita can refer to income per capita, money supply per capita, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, or even net worth per capita. Income per capita can refer to discretionary income per capita or disposable income per capita, for example.</h3>
Disposable income per capita is one way to measure a country's wealth. This refers to the average person's income available for spending and saving after taxes have been paid.
The United States had $53,122 in disposable income per capita in 2018, the largest of any nation.
Other countries with high disposable income per capita figures included Luxembourg, Switzerland, Germany and Australia
<span>Rawls' philosophy that inequalities are justified if they benefit the position of the least-advantaged person is known as the: difference principle.
For example, let's say that there is a running competition between grown man and young boy. But, the grown man has to run carrying a 50kgs of weight on his shoulder.
In this case, even though there is inequality in the race, it's justified because it benefit the least-advantage person(the young boy)</span>
Answer:
it depends it could be well or it could cause a war
Explanation:
why it might not work:
1. they might fight for the same resources
2. if there is not enough food people might need to get it from other countries and end up in a war
3. if there was a war going you would have to join and help
4. people might make wrong accusations
why its good:
1. if a country is on the verge of war they could negotiate
2. if there are allies then they could share food
3. trading
4. they can help each other grow
