Social deviation, from the theory of symbolic interactionism, should focus on analyzing the communication of individuals and its impact on their behavior.
<h3>What is symbolic interactionism?</h3>
Symbolic interactionism is a sociological term that refers to a current of thought that is based on the understanding of society through communication and that has greatly influenced media studies.
Symbolic interactionism is situated within the interpretive paradigm that analyzes the meaning of social action from the perspective of the participants.
<h3>How to interpret social deviation from symbolic interactionism?</h3>
To interpret social deviation from symbolic interactionism, we must focus on identifying the communication that exists in individuals and how this directly impacts their way of thinking and their behavior.
For example, the interaction and communication of a young person with his parents and his schoolmates can determine his behavior, causing him to tend to social deviation because he feels excluded or set apart by society.
Learn more about symbolic interactionism in: brainly.com/question/8174927
#SPJ1
Taking into account that statistics involves a process of collecting, presenting, analysing and interpreting data numerically, limitations may affect this process. Statistics limitations may be concerned with offering information that only applies to the average population. Besides, statistical limitations appear when results are influenced by inaccurate assumptions as well as when results are reported by invalid sources. Consequently, option "D" is not considered a limitation since statistics often assists in advocating for positive change.
The answer is the Battle of Lexington and Concord that was
fought on April 19, 1775 in Boston. 700
British troops were ordered to apprehend the patriots but through good
intelligence, they were able to learn about and made preparations. The British won at Lexington while the
Americans were victorious at Concord.
Answer:
The given claim: "The good depends on the results of what you do." which refers to the concept of Consequentialism.
Explanation:
Consequentialism:
It is such a philosophy that is based on the following principles:
- The act may be considered good or bad depending upon its good or bad results.
- The more good results an act produce, the more right will be the act.
- The problem with the given claim is that the person who follow this theory can say that: It is good to murder a X person as this X person is dangerous for some 50 people. Because this act of murdering is giving relief to 50 people so the murder of a single person is justifiable.
There was no uniform currency, states had too much power national government had nothing. there was no military/protection other than what the states could afford themselves. there were no taxes so funding was hard.
