If the roots to such a polynomial are 2 and

, then we can write it as

courtesy of the fundamental theorem of algebra. Now expanding yields

which would be the correct answer, but clearly this option is not listed. Which is silly, because none of the offered solutions are *the* polynomial of lowest degree and leading coefficient 1.
So this makes me think you're expected to increase the multiplicity of one of the given roots, or you're expected to pull another root out of thin air. Judging by the choices, I think it's the latter, and that you're somehow supposed to know to use

as a root. In this case, that would make our polynomial

so that the answer is (probably) the third choice.
Whoever originally wrote this question should reevaluate their word choice...
Jamie has 365,987,784 dollars and 365,987,784 trees add them up and divide your total by 567,789,123,432,765,654,345 what's your
il63 [147K]
365,987,784+<span>365,987,784
</span>731975568/<span>567,789,123,432,765,654,345
</span><span>1.289168^12
</span>
Answer:
The answer is C
Step-by-step explanation:
We have f(x) function as below:

and the converted function g(x) is as mentioned below:

We can observe that:
f(x)=-g(x)
Therefore it can be said that this function reflected horizontally.
Note: please check the plot attached.
Answer:
x>-8
Step-by-step explanation:
7x+11>5x-5
2x+11>-5
2x>-16
x>-8
the > sign acts like an equal sign :)
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, because there is a constant rate of change. It is and will always be constantly increasing by 1.5.
To be a linear line you have to have a constant rate of change.