1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
In-s [12.5K]
3 years ago
10

1. Describe reapportionment and redistricting and explain why these processes have to be done every 10 years. (3 points) 2. Expl

ain the goal of redistricting. How does redistricting support the democratic process? (2 points)
Social Studies
2 answers:
vazorg [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Reapportionment is the division of congressional districts among states. Redistricting is actual division of districts within a state. These processes are done every 10 years because since number of people living in a state goes up, the state may get more seats, so occasionally the U.S House seats must be redivided.

2. The main goal of redistricting is to equalize district populations by creating equal districts so that each congressional and state representative represents the same number of people, and voters have the same opportunity to participate in the democratic process

Explanation:

damaskus [11]3 years ago
6 0

Reapportionment occurs when a state is assigned a particular number of seats in the House of Representatives. The number of seats that they get depends on the population of the state. On the other hand, redistricting occurs when the state is divided into districts according to the number of seats a state has. Districts should contain roughly the same number of voters. The reason why these processes have to be repeated every ten years is because of population changes, including moves, births and deaths.

The goal of this process is to be able to hold elections in the most legitimate and efficient way possible. Each district is able to chose a representative, and because of this, it is very important to have districts that represent the interests of the people of the state, and which are not manipulated in illegitimate ways. This also allows voters to be represented by the candidate of their choice.

You might be interested in
In order to become a naturalized citizen, a noncitizen must:
ratelena [41]

Answer:

what are the options???????

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where is the state city and landmark of this place?
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

I know that's California and that bridge is San Francisco

But that building look like a hotel

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Lindsay hopes to gain admission to graduate school to become a chemical engineer, and needs to take the graduate record exams (g
vaieri [72.5K]
The answer would most probably be, <span>Her score on the exam will probably be lower than it would be if she was less aware of her gender identity.

Claude Steele</span> is the twenty-first Provost of Columbia University, as well as a Professor of Psychology. <span>Dr. Steele is best known for his work on stereotype threat and its application to minority student academic performance. His earlier work dealt with research on the self (e.g., self-image, self-affirmation) as well as the role of self-regulation in addictive behaviors.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"If you aren't paying for the product, you are the product"- What does this mean and how do
yaroslaw [1]

Answer:

If you are not paying for the product ,you are the product means: you doesnt need paying for a product,your information is product(money).

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is an accurate comparison of the two court cases?Baker v. Carr (1961) - Shaw v. Reno (1993)A. Ruled that
madreJ [45]

Answer:

(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts

Explanation:

Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.

Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do you need to know for the permit test?
    8·1 answer
  • A young child who sees a cow for the first time calls it a "doggie." this illustrates the process of:
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true?
    15·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition The interactive process through which people learn the basic
    12·2 answers
  • Which principle of behavior expects you to resist adversary exploitation despite the pervasive physical and environmental contro
    11·2 answers
  • In organizations where a majority of workers perform repetitive operations there is often a lack of
    12·1 answer
  • Does money make the personality of person​
    10·1 answer
  • What elements of western economic do the Bhutanese embrace? What elements does video tell me they reject? What other elements of
    6·1 answer
  • CORRECT ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST!!! PLEASE HELP !
    11·1 answer
  • Tire How can the diverse land term be supportive for the development of Nepal Explain. ​
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!