Answer:
nature , nurture
Explanation:
The long held debate of nature vs nurture, arises from ancient philosopers and continues in the present. In the yaer of 1869 the issue was named "Nature versus Nurture" by Englishmen Francis Galton.
It was a time where the genotypes and clues of the existence of the DNA were emerging, and people where to observe if genetics shaped personality- or if in the contrary the cultural, social, and educational experiencies will be more important in personality formation.
There exists today a widespread consensus that, to certain degree, there will be always some natural components like the eye color and color of skin, that will however after birth be shaped by environmental factors and the lifestyle.
In the case of other internal characteristics, internal and external forces will shape as well.
Despite the widespread notion that Latino refers to any Spanish speaking person, Latino actually refers to people from Latin America - Mexicans, Brazilians, Bolivians, Cubans, etc. Many people think Latino and Hispanic are interchangeable, when they in fact are not. Someone who speaks Spanish is Hispanic, but not necessarily Latino, and vice versa. For example, Spanish people from Spain; they are Hispanic, but not Latino. Someone from Brazil is Latino, but not Hispanic. However, someone from Mexico is Hispanic and Latino.
I hope this helps.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because the declaration of independence was the product of organization diba
Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence
Keys and/legend that’s the best answer
