Answer:
Probably not, because the terms are not definite.
Explanation:
A contract is considered to be valid when there is a written or expressed agreement for one party to deliver goods or services to another.
The terms are clearly stated. For example the price, time of sale, acceptance of price, and so on.
A valid contract has the following elements: offer, acceptance, agreement, and consideration.
In the given scenario where Kelly tells Matthew that she will sell him one of her motorcycles at some time in the future and Matthew eagerly accepts. There is an agreement but there is no specific offer and consideration of price and also the time of transaction.
So the contract is probably not valid because terms are not clearly defined.
The most important factor in the
work process or industry is to retain the interest of the employee. And to
retain them, their salary or profit must be adjusted to the best value. Unless
the employee does not do his job properly, employees must receive bonuses or
benefits to ensure them to stay in the company. It will actually make them stay
longer, make them feel important and reduce costs for hiring new employees.
Answer:
c. feels the marginal benefit of an extra hour of studying exceeds the marginal cost of not playing basketball.
Explanation:
Russel made a choice to study for an hour instead of playing basketball. When making choices people weigh the benefits of an action against its opportunity cost.
Opportunity cost is the forgone alternative when we choose to do something.
In this instance Russell chose to study and the opportunity cost was to enjoy playing a basketball game.
For him to choose to study it means he saw the benefit of reading to be greater than the marginal cost of playing basketball. So he chose the most beneficial activity for him.
True.
I hope this helps! :)