9514 1404 393
Answer:
- Translate P to E; rotate ∆PQR about E until Q is coincident with F; reflect ∆PQR across EF
- Reflect ∆PQR across line PR; translate R to G; rotate ∆PQR about G until P is coincident with E
Step-by-step explanation:
The orientations of the triangles are opposite, so a reflection is involved. The various segments are not at right angles to each other, so a rotation other than some multiple of 90° is involved. A translation is needed in order to align the vertices on top of one another.
The rotation is more easily defined if one of the ∆PQR vertices is already on top of its corresponding ∆EFG vertex, so that translation should precede the rotation. The reflection can come anywhere in the sequence.
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
The mapping can be done in two transformations: translate a ∆PQR vertex to its corresponding ∆EFG point; reflect across the line that bisects the angle made at that vertex by corresponding sides.
Answer: Can you explain more? you have to calculate it by an theorm
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Cuando rechazamos la hipótesis nula, esperaríamos que la razón de varianza, a largo plazo, sea: <u>mayor al valor crítico.</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
Correct me if I’m wrong but I believe it to b
Answer:
Option B
3.5 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
Considering the picture attached, the distance to Cascade Falls is written in mixed fraction and the question wants it expressed in decimal. 
is same as 1 divided by 2 which is 0.5 hence the fall is 3+0.5=3.5 miles
