<h3>
Answer:</h3>
The reasoning is correct. The ratio of number of bulbs tested to defective bulbs is always 14 to 1.
<h3>
Step-by-step explanation:</h3>
We generally expect industrial processes to produce defects at about the same rate, meaning the proportion of defective product is generally considered to be a constant. Here, the proportion of defective bulbs is ...
... 1/14 = 2/28 = 6/84
so we expect it will be also 24/336. That is, the ratio of the number of bulbs tested to defective bulbs is expected to remain constant at about 14.
{(sin (x))^2A(csc(x))^3(cos))3B+(-3x)
{cot (dx) cos (x)
Answer:
Δ BEC ≅ Δ AED
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider triangles BCA and ADB. Each of them share a common side, AB. Respectively each we should be able to tell that AD is congruent to BC, and DB is congruent to CA, so by SSS the triangles should be congruent.
_________
So another possibility is triangles BEC, and AED. As you can see, by the Vertical Angles Theorem m∠BEC = m∠ADE, resulting in the congruency of an angle, rather a side. As mentioned before AD is congruent to BC, and perhaps another side is congruent to another in the same triangle. It should be then, by SSA that the triangles are congruent - but that is not an option. SSA does is one of the exceptions, a rule that is not permitted to make the triangles congruent. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that triangles BEC and AED are congruent, but that is what our solution, comparative to the rest.
Δ BEC ≅ Δ AED .... this is our solution
