That Claudius is a true villain when hamlet found out that he was going to kill him laertes dad got tricked and so laetes was going to kill hamlet for Claudius
D. I did not remember that fact until my older sister reminded me.
Among the sentences presented, this is the sentence that contains an adverb clause, "I did not remember that fact until my older sister reminded me." The adverb clause in this sentence is "until my older sister reminded me". An adverb clause is simply a part of the sentence that contains a subject and a verb with a subordinate conjunction. The subordinate conjunction do not allow the clause to have a complete meaning. An adverb clause also answers to the question how, when, where and why. In this case, the adverb clause answers to the question "how".
Answer:
Written Below.
Explanation:
I have put 2 answers, you can pick 1.
1. Wallace used ethos to support the claim that Alabama has the right to continue policies of racial segregation. He referenced the US Constitution that says states should have their own rights. America does not have a king, and rights are divided among the states. Therefore, he says states should decide on issues of segregation.
2. Former Governor of Alabama George Wallace ran in the 1968 United States presidential election as the candidate for the American Independent Party. Wallace's pro-segregation policies during his term as Governor of Alabama were rejected by the mainstream of the Democratic Party. The impact of the Wallace campaign was substantial, winning the electoral votes of several states in the Deep South. Although Wallace did not expect to win the election, his strategy was to prevent either major party candidate from winning a majority in the Electoral College. This would throw the election into the House of Representatives, where Wallace would have bargaining power sufficient enough to determine, or at least strongly influence, the selection of a winner.
Sidenote: Hope this helps! :D
The murder of JonBenét Ramsey is the first thing that popped up in my mind of unsolved mystery and murder cases. she was a young girl, only 6 years old. her family was incredibly wealthy and everything seemed normal. people still talk about her case to this day because everything about it was so odd and explanations didn’t add up, also most people think that her brother or other family members committed the crime. dont know much ab this case but i just remember watching videos on it when i was younger
This story is not a usual one. It talks about how our views and ideas can be judgmental and hurtful. It puts us (readers) in a point where we start thinking about our own perspectives.
Explanation:
This story has two main components as symbols - belief and honesty. The author wants to describe the entire scene in darkness. He excludes elements that give us 'hope' in our lives.
The woman who the narrator loved deceived him. She portrayed to be a faithful, honest and innocent woman who loved him deeply. This was an impression that everyone had about her including the narrator.
The story starts off with an exclamation of grief, where he yells 'I had loved her madly!'. From this part of the story, he continues to talk and express his love/emotion towards his lover. He continues to suffer in her loss, goes to places where he can relive moments, visits her grave and sits there for hours. He reads the messages on the tombstones where the story ends.
The entire course of story makes us understand that he understand how she deceived him from the beginning till the end.