If a firm can raise the market price by reducing its output, then It faces a downward-sloping demand curve.
If a superbly aggressive company increases its rate above the prevailing market fee, it'll lose its entire marketplace proportion, and income will lessen to 0.
Monopolists aren't allocatively efficient, due to the fact they do not produce at the amount wherein P = MC. As a result, monopolists produce less, at a higher average cost, and rate a higher price than could a combination of firms in a superbly competitive enterprise.
The monopolist will choose the income-maximizing degree of output in which MR = MC, and then fee the fee for that quantity of output as decided by using the marketplace call for curve. If that rate is above average fee, the monopolist earns high-quality earnings.
Learn more about the demand curve here: brainly.com/question/9387886
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct statement option is b.
Explanation:
The replacement decision involves an analysis of two independent projects where cash flows include the initial investment, additional depreciation and the terminal value.
The replacement decision is the process of identifying, evaluating and taking decisions on two or more independent alternatives. During this process company evaluate various alternatives of investment in different projects and select one of the best alternative based on its cost, rate of return, time required and risk associated with it etc.
Answer:
The incomplete part of the question is "Using a cap-and-trade system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $1 million per year. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution? If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction will be $1 million per year." The full question is attched as picture as well
1) Tradable permit system
Then lower MAC firm will abate the all pollution units
Then as MAC1 = $250, MAC2 = $275
Firm 1 = Consolidated electric
Firm 2 = Commonwealth utility
Then 1 will sell all permits to 2, at a price between $250 & $275.
So total cost of abatement of 20 units = MAC1 * 20
= $250 * 20 Unit
= $5,000
2) Non-tradable permits
Total cost = MC1*10 + MC2*10
= $2,500 + $2,750
= $5,250
Jan. 1, 2013:
Initial investment = (100 shares)*($30/share) = $3,000.
End of 2013:
Dividend collected = ($2/share)*(100 shares) = $200
End of 2014:
Dividend collected = ($3/share)*(100 shares) = $300
End of 2015:
Dividend collected = ($4/share)*(100 shares) = $400
Returns::
From sales of 100 shares = ($33/share)*(100 shares) = $3,300
From dividends = 200 + 300 + 400 = $900
Total returns = 3,300 + 900 = $4,200
Realized returns = Total returns - Initial inestment
= 4200 - 3000
= $1,200
Answer: $1,200
