All of the above
_______________________________________________
<h2>Answer : By weighing the costs and benefits of an environmental issue
</h2><h3>
Explanation :</h3>
The law makers usually conduct many studies before a law is imposed. They try to explore many other options available to the current environmental issue and then come to a conclusion to make a law.
They also weigh the cost aspect along with the benefit of the ongoing environmental issue. They try to come up with something which appears to be cost effective and result bearing.
The answer will be A & B not only because it makes sense but evaporation is taking water away not adding to (gaining)
Answer:
a solution color becoming less intense due to dilution- is not an evidence of a chemical reaction
bubbles (gas formation) - evidence of a chemical reaction
explosion or fire - evidence of a chemical reaction
changes in color- evidence of a chemical reaction
precipitation- evidence of a chemical reaction
changes in temperature - evidence of a chemical reaction
a solid liquifying - is not an evidence of a chemical reaction
solution colors mixing - is not an evidence of a chemical reaction
Explanation:
A chemical change is not easily reversible and yields new substances. It is often accompanied by a loss or gain of heat.
In the answer section, i have shown some evidences that lead us to conclude that a chemical reaction has taken place. The occurrence of a chemical change often goes with the formation of new substances as earlier stated and any of these signs may accompany the process.
For instance, when a metal is dropped in dilute acid solution, bubble of hydrogen gas indicates that a chemical reaction has taken place.
