Answer:
H₂(g) + Cl₂(g) → 2HCl(g) + 185kJ
Explanation:
In a chemical reaction, enthalpy of reaction ΔH is a thermodynamic constant that gives information if the reaction is exothermic (Produce heat if reacts) or endothermic (Consume heat if reacts).
In the reaction:
H₂(g) + Cl₂(g) → 2HCl(g) ΔH = -185kJ
As ΔH <0, the reaction is exothermic, that means, <em>produce heat</em>, writing a balanced thermochemical equation:
<em>H₂(g) + Cl₂(g) → 2HCl(g) + 185kJ</em>
<em></em>
The enthalpy is as a product beacause an exothermic reaction produces heat.
I hope it helps!
<em></em>
The answer is : 17.5 liters drained and replaced by 17.5 liters of 100% solution.
x = amount drained and replaced
(70-x) = remaining amount of 20% solution
<span>.20(70-x) + 1.00(x) = .40(70)
14 - .2x + 1x = 28
1x - .2x = 28 - 14
</span><span>.8x = 14
</span><span>x = 14/.8
x= 17,5 ( 17.5 liters drained and replaced by 17.5 liters of 100% solution)
</span>
Answer is B. gas formation
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
0.819 mol Ag
<h3>
General Formulas and Concepts:</h3>
<u>Math</u>
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
<u>Chemistry</u>
<u>Atomic Structure</u>
- Avogadro's Number - 6.022 × 10²³ atoms, molecules, formula units, etc.
<u>Stoichiometry</u>
- Using Dimensional Analysis
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
4.93 × 10²³ atoms Ag
<u>Step 2: Identify Conversions</u>
Avogadro's Number
<u>Step 3: Convert</u>
- Set up:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5972f/5972f29f5e485d3506b3d2d84c16d5967accf529" alt="\displaystyle 4.93 \cdot 10^{23} \ atoms \ Ag(\frac{1 \ mol \ Ag}{6.022 \cdot 10^{23} \ atoms \ Ag})"
- Divide:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c0c1/1c0c1cdbc93940eeebc50854931a818d8373c766" alt="\displaystyle 0.818665 \ mol \ Ag"
<u>Step 4: Check</u>
<em>Follow sig fig rules and round. We are given 3 sig figs.</em>
0.818665 mol Ag ≈ 0.819 mol Ag
Answer:
The correct approach is Option B (Peer Review).
Explanation:
- Rather made reference to someone as a scientific peer-review, it encourages the specialist who has not been essential to the study team to analyze the study objectively and pointed out everyone's mistakes. It serves as major self-regulation for scholars and aims to make the publishing process somewhat credible. Hence, the solution to this issue is Peer Examination.
- Funding organizations rarely have the capabilities to recognize out mistakes, whereas definitive analysis is a method of study that helps to make a definitive statement. The gathering of data is simply a process of scientific study.
Other approaches do not apply to the example mentioned. Although the one mentioned is right.