All categories

3 years ago

In a(n) _____ organization, top managers make all the decisions and pass them down to lower levels for implementation

1 answer:

8 0

Partly this statement is true however this does not implies to all.
In a big company, it;s really the top managers who do all the planning and decision making for the good of the company and then cascade it to the lower level for implementations

You might be interested in

For studying demand relationships for a proposed new product that no one has ever used before, what would be the best method to

dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

the answer is D) all of the above are equally useful in this case

Explanation:

why? every company who is planing to offers a new good or product its important to know to which market you want to sell it, and the average age, either the company who had been working with the same product, perhaps more capacity of production in the same market, you have to do a market strategy to know if you are able to get into the new market.

5 0

3 years ago

Give an example of a situation in which a surplus of a product led to decreased prices. similarity, give a example of a situatio

andrew11 [14]

Answer:

Give an example of a situation in which a surplus of a product led to decreased prices. similarity, give a example of a situation in which a shortage led to increased prices. what eventually happened in each case? why?

In the course of having surplus of a product which decreases the price, this happens as a result of high competition as there many people selling the same products which in turns leads to crash in price in order to make sales and little profit.

while product shortage or scarcity happens as a result of decrease in resources or decrease in supply, hence; results into scarcity of products which eventually aids increment of price

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Assume a domestic company in the US, let's say Colgate-Palmolive, is deciding to export to a country where to date Colgate produ

MrMuchimi

Answer:

agent method of entry

Explanation:

Agent method of entry will demonstrate lower fixed costs associated.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

On January 1, 2018, Chamberlain Corporation pays $550,000 for an 80% ownership in Neville. Annual excess fair-value amortization

german

Answer:

The question is missing the options, which are contained in the attached question.

The consolidated net income attributable to the non-controlling interest i $30,000.00 with option D as the correct answer as found in the attached

Explanation:

Neville's net income for the year $175,000.00

less annual excess fair value amortization ($25,000.00)

Net income after excess fair amortization $150,000.00

Chamberlain's share of net income

80%*$150,000.00 ($120,000.00)

Non-controlling interest share of net income $30,000.00

Note that the non-controlling interest is a balancing figure.

Chamberlain consolidated income can be computed thus:

Chamberlain 100% net income $380,000.00

Plus share of Neville's net income $120,000.00

Consolidated net income $500000.00

Download docx

3 0

2 years ago

Market Corporation owns 100% of Subsidiary Corporation's stock. Market Corporation completely liquidates Subsidiary Corporation,

kykrilka [37]

Answer:

b. $400,000

Explanation:

According to the historical cost principle, the land or fixed assets should be reported in the financial statement with the purchase price or historical price.

In the given situation, the land receiving value is $400,000 and its fair market value or FMV is $500,000 and exchange value is $300,000

So, here the land should be recorded at $400,000. Hence, we ignored the fair market value and the exchanged value

6 0

3 years ago