Based on the equation, determine what happens to the period, T, as the frequency increases.

An acid and base will combine to form a new substance with new properties in a

garri49 [273]

Answer:

A salt

Explanation:

When an acid and a base are placed together, they react to neutralize the acid and base properties, producing a salt. The H(+) cation of the acid combines with the OH(-) anion of the base to form water. The compound formed by the cation of the base and the anion of the acid is called a salt

4 0

2 years ago

Elements with similar properties are located

Nataly [62]

Those elements with similar properties are in the same column.

4 0

3 years ago

An analytical chemist is titrating of a solution of propionic acid with a solution of 224.9 ml of a 0.6100M solution of propioni

Svetllana [295]

Answer: The pH of acid solution is 4.58

Explanation:

To calculate the number of moles for given molarity, we use the equation:

$\text{Molarity of the solution}=\frac{\text{Moles of solute}\times 1000}{\text{Volume of solution (in mL)}}$ .....(1)

For KOH:

Molarity of KOH solution = 1.1000 M

Volume of solution = 41.04 mL

Putting values in equation 1, we get:

$1.1000M=\frac{\text{Moles of KOH}\times 1000}{41.04}\\\\\text{Moles of KOH}=\frac{1.1000\times 41.04}{1000}=0.04514mol$

For propanoic acid:

Molarity of propanoic acid solution = 0.6100 M

Volume of solution = 224.9 mL

Putting values in equation 1, we get:

$0.6100M=\frac{\text{Moles of propanoic acid}\times 1000}{224.9}\\\\\text{Moles of propanoic acid}=\frac{0.6100\times 224.9}{1000}=0.1372mol$

The chemical reaction for propanoic acid and KOH follows the equation:

$C_2H_5COOH+KOH\rightarrow C_2H_5COOK+H_2O$

Initial: 0.1372 0.04514

Final: 0.09206 - 0.04514

Total volume of solution = [224.9 + 41.04] mL = 265.94 mL = 0.26594 L (Conversion factor: 1 L = 1000 mL)

To calculate the pH of acidic buffer, we use the equation given by Henderson Hasselbalch:

$pH=pK_a+\log(\frac{[\text{salt}]}{[acid]})$

$pH=pK_a+\log(\frac{[C_2H_5COOK]}{[C_2H_5COOH]})$

We are given:

$pK_a$ = negative logarithm of acid dissociation constant of propanoic acid = 4.89

$[C_2H_5COOK]=\frac{0.04514}{0.26594}$

$[C_2H_5COOH]=\frac{0.09206}{0.26594}$

pH = ?

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$pH=4.89+\log(\frac{(0.04514/0.26594)}{(0.09206/0.26594)})\\\\pH=4.58$

Hence, the pH of acid solution is 4.58

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose a laboratory wants to identify an unknown pure substance. The valence electrons of the substance's atoms feel an effecti

zalisa [80]

Answer:

The answer is the third option in the list: It would have smaller atomic radii than Si and higher ionization energies than Si.

Explanation:

The effective nuclear charge is that portion of the total nuclear charge that a given electron in an atom feels.

Since, the inner electrons repel the outer electrons, the effective nuclear charge of a determined electron is the sum of the positive charge (number of protons or atomic number) that it feels from the nucleus less the number of electrons that are in the shells that are are closer to the nucleus than the own shell of such (determined) electron.

Mathematically, the effective nuclear charge (Zeff) is equal to the atomic number (Z) minus the amount (S) that other electrons in the atom shield the given (determined) atom from the nucleus.

Zeff = Z - S.

Since, the valence electrons are the electrons in the outermost shell of the atom, you can find certain trend for the value Zeff.

Let's look at the group to which Si belongs, which is the group 14. This table summarizes the relevant data:

Element Z Group # valence electrons S Zeff = Z - S

C 6 14 4 6 - 4 = 2 6 - 2 = +4

Si 14 14 4 14 - 4 = 10 14 - 10 = +4

Ge 32 14 4 32 - 4 = 28 32 -28 = +4

Sn 50 14 4 50 - 4 = 46 50 - 46 = +4

Pb 82 14 4 82 - 4 = 78 82 - 78 = +4

With that, you have shown that the valence electrons of the unknown substance's atoms feel an effective nuclear charge of +4 and you have a short list of 4 elements which can be the unknown element: C, Ge, Sn or Pb.

The second known characteristic of the unknown substance's atoms is that it has a higher electronegativity than silicon (Si).

So, you must use the known trend of the electronegativity in a group of the periodic table: the electronegativity decreases as you go down in a group. So, three of the elements (Ge, Sn, and Pb) have lower electronegativity than Si, which has left us with only one possibility: the element C. The valence electrons of carbon (C) atoms feel an effective nuclear charge of +4 and it carbon has a higher electronegativity than silicon.

Other two periodic trends attending the group number are the atomic radii and the ionization energy.

The atomic radii generally increases as you go from top to bottom in a group. This is because you are adding electrons to new higher main energy levels. So, you can conclude that the originally unknwon substance (carbon) has a smaller atomic radii, than Si.

The ionization energies generally decreases as you go from top to bottom in a group. This os due to the shielding effect: as seen, the effective nuclear charge of the atom's valence electrons remains constant, while the distance of the electrons from the nucleus increases (the valence electrons are farther away from the nucleus), which means the upper the element in a given group, the larger the ionization energy of the atoms.

With this, our conclusions about the unnkown substance are:

Since it has a higher electronegativity value than silicon (Si), it is right up of Si, and there is on only element possible element than can be (C).

Since, it is upper than silicon (Si), it would have smaller atomic radii.

Due to the shielding effect, it would have larger ionization energies.

The answer is the third option in the list: It would have smaller atomic radii than Si and higher ionization energies than Si.

6 0

2 years ago

A formal operational thinker and a concrete operational thinker are both presented with three beakers containing red liquid and

Jlenok [28]

Answer:

The formal thinker would take a systematic approach in the combination of the liquids, thereby eliminating several unnecessary combinations that the concrete thinker would definitely combine.

Explanation:

The formal operational stage in thinking begins when a child gets to the age of 12 and continues to adulthood. The formal operational stage provides an individual with the ability to think abstractly by manipulating ideas in their head without concretely manipulating it. A concrete would have to see something to be able to manipulate any ideas.

3 0

3 years ago