To find the gcf you have to wright down the factors of both the numbers, all of them. Then, find the one that is the greatest number, but both 36 and 27 have, which would be 9
Add 6 to both sides so the -6 cancels out then divide the 38 you will get from 44-6 by 5 (38/5) to get your answer
You can work out the percentage change and that would help you work out the rate of appreciation :)
The formula is ((new value - old value)/old value) * 100.
So you do 
Therefore the rate of appreciation is 8% p/a.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is:
H0: μ(1995)=μ(2019)
The alternative hypothesis is:
H1: μ(1995)<μ(2019)
Because Roger wants to know if mean weight of 16-old males in 2019 is more than the mean weight of 16-old males in 1995 the test only uses one tail of the z-distribution. It is not a two-sided test because in that case the alternative hypothesis would be: μ(1995)≠μ(2019).
To know the p-value, we use the z-statistic, in this case 1.89 and the significance level. Because the problem does not specify it, we will search for the p-value at a 5% significance level and at a 1%.
For a z of 1.89 and 5% significance level, the p-value is: 0.9744
For a z of 1.89 and 1% significance level, the p-value is: 0.9719
