A. Republicans & amp; Democrats
The correct answer is C. Peers tend to reinforce gender roles by criticizing and marginalizing those who behave outside of their assigned roles
Explanation:
Socialization is the process in which individuals understood and integrate cultural elements, this includes norms, appropriate behaviors and gender roles that determine attitudes and behaviors that belong to women, men or both. About this, there are different agents of socialization such as peers, family, religion among others that played an important role not only by providing models of behavior but also because agents of socialization reinforce cultural elements by criticizing or rejecting behaviors that represent a violation into the social order and praising those that follow the social order.
Considering this, the one that is the best example of the role peers play as agent of socialization is that peers tend to reinforce gender roles by criticizing and marginalizing those who behave outside of their assigned roles as in this way children learned and preserve behaviors and attitudes that are considered as appropriate in their context and therefore peers act as an agent of socialization.
Answer:
dual coding hypothesis
Explanation:
Dual coding hypothesis was proposed by Allan Pavio in 1971 which describes cognitive techniques of dealing with verbal and non-verbal processing of information stimuli and it states that the ability to code an information input in two different ways (visual and imagery) increases the chance of remembering that item compared to if the stimulus was only coded one way (e.g in words alone)
C for the first one ( fifth amendment ) & b for the second one ( us constitution )
This is an example of C. importance of political knowledge.
These people didn't know enough about politics and the politicians they were voting for which is evident based on this question. They favored some politicians because they were gullible and didn't understand that favoring them won't really give them any benefits. If they had more knowledge, they would probably have voted for a better candidate.