Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
Answer:
retrieval failure
Explanation:
Retrieval failure: In psychology, the term "retrieval failure" is described as a forgetting phenomenon which is related to a person's "long-term memory", and is defined as specific difficulties that an individual faces while recalling a piece of information due to the fact that a certain retrieval triggers or cues are absent.
Cause: An individual who experiences difficulty or incapability in receiving specific memories.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the retrieval failure.
Don’t quote me on this but I believe that it is b
No killing Respect for Life
no stealing a respect for other people’s property.
No sexual misconduct respect for our pure nature.
No lying respect for honesty.
No intoxicants respect for a clear-mind.