Answer:
Answer 1:
2,147,616
Answer 2:
5,145,330
Answer 3:
3,758,328
Answer 4:
8,157,958
Step-by-step explanation:
These are all correct i got 10/10.
Okay I think there has been a transcription issue here because it appears to me there are two answers. However I can spot where some brackets might be missing, bear with me on that.
A direct variation, a phrase I haven't heard before, sounds a lot like a direct proportion, something I am familiar with. A direct proportion satisfies two criteria:
The gradient of the function is constant s the independent variable (x) varies
The graph passes through the origin. That is to say when x = 0, y = 0.
Looking at these graphs, two can immediately be ruled out. Clearly A and D pass through the origin, and the gradient is constant because they are linear functions, so they are direct variations.
This leaves B and C. The graph of 1/x does not have a constant gradient, so any stretch of this graph (to y = k/x for some constant k) will similarly not be direct variation. Indeed there is a special name for this function, inverse proportion/variation. It appears both B and C are inverse proportion, however if I interpret B as y = (2/5)x instead, it is actually linear.
This leaves C as the odd one out.
I hope this helps you :)
Answer:
Well, You possibly did all the math depending on the question. But if it was subtraction that means there's one candy bar left
step-by-step explanation:
I hope this helped in any way!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Area of ABCD = L * W</u>
<u>Area of EFGC:- L * W</u>
<u>Now, the area of the combind rectangles:-</u>
ABCD + EFGC
