1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
luda_lava [24]
2 years ago
8

The recipe demanded great skill, and my mother herself had doubts that we would be successful in making the dish. However, in th

e end we were able to prepare it all by its self. Which pronoun is used incorrectly?
English
1 answer:
babunello [35]2 years ago
6 0

The incorrect pronoun used in the sentence is 'its self-

It is also written incorrectly since it is spelled itself.

The correct pronoun for that sentence would be ourselves since the speaker and her mother form a plural subject, (we, which is the first person of the plural.) The correct pronoun for we would be ourselves in that particular paragraph

You might be interested in
Montaigne’s gory description of cannibalism is a metaphor for a0 behavior by civilized people.
DerKrebs [107]
The answer should be BARBARIC behavior
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A rectangle's width is 23 cm and its length is 9cm. What is its area?
Mariana [72]
Salutations!

<span>A rectangle's width is 23 cm and its length is 9cm. What is its area?

So lets solve this!

You need to know the formula to find the area of a rectangle.

The formula is = Length </span>×<span> Width

This is just direct multiplications-------

l 
</span>×<span> b =

23 
</span>×<span> 9 =

207 cm
</span>²

Thus, your answer is 207cm²

Hope I helped!

<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Just mercy chapter 7
Sati [7]
Stevenson requests a direct appeal of Walter’s conviction. In his written brief, he notes several flaws in Walter’s case, including faulty witness testimonies, State misconduct, racial bias in jury selection, and an unnecessary judge override of the jury’s life sentence. At the appeals court in Montgomery, Stevenson appears before Chief Judge John Patterson, the KKK-backed former Alabama governor notorious for resisting de-segregation and refusing to allow law enforcement to protect the Freedom Riders from violent mobs. At the end of Stevenson’s oral argument, Judge Patterson responds by asking Stevenson where he is from. Stevenson, caught off guard, responds that he “lives in Montgomery.” Stevenson regrets dissuading Walter’s family from requesting time off to travel to Montgomery, now wondering if their supportive presence would have helped distinguish Walter’s case. The State’s lawyer defends Walter’s conviction as “routine” and his sentence as “appropriately imposed.” Judge Patterson denies the appeal.
Stevenson encourages Walter to remain hopeful because they have new evidence and several remaining options, including a reconsideration of the direct appeal decision. Stevenson recently hired Michael O’Connor, a son of Irish immigrants and recovered heroin addict originally from a rough neighborhood. Though Michael regards his history of addiction with regret, Stevenson sees his background as an asset to their work. Stevenson and his colleagues have discovered records showing that county officials paid Bill Hooks and “somehow” had his city criminal charges dropped, which is information that the State should legally have disclosed pre-trial. They also found flyers advertising the fish fry held at Walter’s house, which confirmed it was held the day of the murder. They contacted Walter’s mechanic, who discredited Bill Hook’s testimony by confirming that the mechanic modified Walter’s truck six months after Ronda’s murder. Finally, a clerk at the store where Myers was asked to identify Walter confirms that Myers had to ask which black man was Walter.
Stevenson’s determination to pursue all available recourses for Walter demonstrates his perseverance and commitment to this case. Stevenson’s positive reaction to Michael’s story of addiction serves to reinforce the book’s emphasis on the importance of redemption. By framing Michael’s past mistakes as assets, Stevenson implies that he values having staff members who can identify with the population they serve. Michael’s past allows him to see clients as more fully human, and enables clients to trust Michael more easily. Stevenson implies that county officials conducted illegal activity, which they intentionally hid. Further, he implies that the corruption included collaboration with city, everything.”
8 0
2 years ago
Joe has 12 fewer books than Moe. If Joe has 30 books, how many books does Moe have?
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

42

Explanation:

M=12+42=54 since J has fewer books than M, which means that M has more books than J.

5 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help me with this?!!
timofeeve [1]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Does the play have to end this way? What might Arthur Miller, the author, be trying to communicate to the audience with this end
    5·1 answer
  • Conclusion sentence for how is the authors point of view different from the point of view of someone who believes the legend of
    14·1 answer
  • Which words in the sentence make up the participial phrase? The musician, tuning his instrument, prepared to resume the concert.
    8·2 answers
  • Using the questions of classical invention can help you
    7·2 answers
  • What do the details in these lines reveal about Odysseus’ feelings?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following defines a network?
    12·2 answers
  • Just tell me the answer below<br> The story
    11·2 answers
  • How might readers understand and relate to a fictional Tesla?
    9·1 answer
  • Why would you want to use a comma+conjunction to separate two independent clauses?
    13·1 answer
  • Suchna gantantara diwas​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!