Answer:
d. If the WACC is 9%, Project B's NPV will be higher than Project A's.
Explanation:
The internal rate of return is the return in which the NPV is zero i.e cash inflows equal to the initial investment
While the WACC refers to the cost of capital by considering the capital structure i.e cost of equity, cost of preferred stock and cost of debt by taking their weightage
Now if the WACC is 9% so project B NPV would be higher as compared to project A as we can see that project B IRR is greater than the project A IRR
Therefore option d is correct
Here are the four major needs:
Answer:
b. $20.
Explanation:
Regardless of what the break-even volume is, at this volume profits are zero.
This means that any unit sold beyond this point will provide a profit equivalent to its marginal benefit, which is its selling price subtracted by its variable cost.
If a product sells for $50 and has a variable cost of $30, by selling one unit in excess of its break-even volume, the profit will be:
![P= \$50-\$30 =\$20](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%3D%20%5C%2450-%5C%2430%20%3D%5C%2420)
The profit will be $20.
I'm am pretty sure the answer is b.
Answer: A. Lowering the degree of operating leverage.
Explanation:
The degree of operating leverage measure how much the earnings from a project will change as a result of sales.
If you are worried about the cash flow forecasts, it would be best to lower the operating leverage so as to reduce the forecasting error associated with the project. If the operating leverage is high then a small change in sales could impact income in a relatively huge way. By reducing the DOL, the cashflow from the project is easier to forecast and therefore more reliable.