Answer:
The right solution is "$3,000 favorable".
Explanation:
The standard taxation deduction throughout the year 2019 is nothing more than the differentiation seen between strike amount of $9 as well as the market value of the company stock of $5.
Besides book specific reason, calculated by multiplying the total number of possibilities used:
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
The manuscript deduction seems to be the valuation of the relevant guidelines throughout the year 2019:
⇒ 
⇒ 
Therefore the large amounts book deduction of 3000 seems to be definitely favorable.
The correct answer to 1 is the ability to easily raise financial capital.
A sole proprietor is limited to the cash that they personally have, so this is a disadvantage when they need additional capital for the business.
The correct answer to 2 is that their personal property can be used to pay debts.
A partnership is personally responsible for the debts of the company. If the company owes money and cannot pay it, the partners that own the business are personally responsible.
The correct answer to 3 is the shareholders.
The shareholders are the owners of the corporation. They vote for a board of directors who in turn oversee the operation of the corporation.
Answer:
C) causing a shortage of funds for investment in physical capital.
Explanation:
In economics, savings equals investment. Higher investments result in higher productivity, that is why the savings rate of a country is the single most important factor in determining future economic growth.
Low savings rate means that current consumption is very large, and that benefits economic growth on the short run (very short run, like 1 or 2 years), but future economic growth will suffer from it.
Imagine your house as the total economy of a nation. You earn $1,000 per month and must decide how much to spend right now and how much to save for future spending. If you spend the $1,000 right now, you will purchase several things and enjoy them immediately. But what happens in one or two weeks. Since you do not have any more money left, you cannot purchase anything else, which reduces your future joy.
Investment increases future wealth and fosters economic prosperity.
<span>The correct answer is that it depends on the specifics of the incentive plan. A general incentive plan that is not linked directly to productivity will typically become old news to staff within a few years. What was once an incentive will become familiar and may be viewed as an entitlement as staff start looking for the eternal "what's next?".
An incentive directly linked to some kind of productivity (e.g. hours worked) will have a far longer shelf life (though this will, of course, vary by employee). In this scenario the ongoing incentive remains year over year (e.g. the hours of overtime worked in the previous year will have no bearing on the current year so if you want a similar result you will need to maintain your effort whereas if you want a better result you will have to increase your effort).
All incentive plans, however, are subject to the rules of diminishing marginal utility to the employees and will diminish over time as the employee either becomes comfortable at a certain productivity level or becomes disenchanted by other factors.
In summation: an incentive plan, if designed properly, can work for a relatively long period of years though results may vary by employee as everyone is motivated by different things (though providing an alternative incentive to money may somewhat mitigate this additional potential problem).</span>
