There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
Answer: The radiation of the Sun's electromagnetic waves.
Explanation: The Earth's surface radiates energy back into the atmosphere. Then Gases in the atmosphere radiate heat back to the surface..:)
Answer:
A strong economy directly benefits me and my family by providing stuff to fit our needs. Such as Water, food, shelter, and sunlight. One could be money and wealth, or two could be food, jobs, or a home. It could be money by providing us with it to buy supplies. Food by, making it and selling it. Jobs so you can provide for you and your family. And lastely, a home, a shelter to live in. These were all ways that a strong, productive economy directly benefits me and my family.
Explanation:
Hope this helps you!
Have a great day and good luck!
Brainliest is appreciated!!!
- Lea
Answer:
Stage 1: Not being aware of conflict occurring. There is a potential for conflict thus you have to be aware of the demand from participants/ workers. AKA Latent Stage
Stage 2: Find the source of conflict and make sure to explore the situation also known as the Perceived stage.
Stage 3: Personalization of conflicts such as the stress, anxiety, or mental health issues that could occur because of the conflict. This can also be known as the Felt stage.
Stage 4: 2 indiviuals or more talk about how they feel about the conflict and are engaging in a conversation to resolve the issue. Thus, the conflict is open and can be observed. Known as Manifest stage.
Stage 5: Aftermath Stage: Outcome of the conflict. Usually, a resolution or a certain agreement starts to happen to ensure that the conflict won't happen again.
Hope this helps!
The Divine Right of Kings
:)
