An area of land under the ruler or a state
Jason studies Spanish for three years, and then switches to Pashto. When asked to remember Spanish vocabulary he can’t, instead he can only remember Pashto vocabulary. This is an example of <u>retroactive </u>interference.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
Retro active interference means that the individual can not remember the older information that he had learnt because the recent information is acting as an obstacle in recalling the older information.
The new information is a problem which does not let the old information to be recalled. That is why Jason can not recall Spanish which he had learnt three years ago and only remembers Pashto which he had learnt recently. Pashto is acting as an obstacle in recalling the Spanish language.
Ok so, King Lois XIV brought the French monarchy to its peak of absolute power and made France the dominant power in Europe. Then, Peter the Great left his mark by bringing Russia into the modern age. Lastly, Suleiman was an excellent leader and helped to transform the Ottoman Empire into one of the greatest empires. Basically what the all have in common is that they all helped to grow and build these empires and make them well known today. They were all considered absolute rulers because of the sacrifices and altered these kingdoms.
Answer:
Katapatan
1. KATAPATAN SA SALITA AT SA GAWA
2. Katapatan sa Salita at Gawa • Ito ay isang birtud na nangangailangan ng kolektibong pagkilos upang mapanatiling buhay at nag-aalab. • Ang pagkakaroon ng malawak na kaalaman at sapat na kakayahan ang magiging sandata upang maging kaisa sa pagpapanatili ng buhay at kinang nito.
3. Katapatan sa Salita at Gawa (Totoo ba ito?) • Naranasan mo na bang lumikha ng kwento sa harap ng iyong mga kaibigan? • Habang ibinabahagi mo ito sakanila, marahil ay labis ang nararamdaman mong kagalakan dahil nakikita mo silang lahat na naniniwala sa sinabi mo.
Answer:
"Operations Security (OPSEC)
" is the correct approach.
Explanation:
- OPSEC becomes a threat analysis mechanism that induces administrators to look at procedures from another adversary's perspectives to defend confidential knowledge from dropping through the incorrect hands.
- However, if the intelligence obtained is not protected under OPSEC, it may offer an opportunity towards an opponent or certain another adversary.