Answer:
Assume the weight to be invested in Bay Corp is x. That means (1 - x) will be the weight for City Inc. The expression for the expected return will be;
(x * 11.2%) + ( (1 - x) * 14.8%) = 12.4%
0.112x + 0.148 - 0.148x = 0.124
-0.036x = -0.024
x = 0.67
Portfolio beta is;
= 0.67 * 1.2 + ( 1 - 0.67) * 1.8
= 1.398 so beta condition is satisfied.
Amount in Bay Corp.;
= 0.67 * 50,000
= $33,500
Amount in City Inc.;
= 50,000 - 33,500
= $16,500
Answer: The income effect
Explanation: The income effect refers to the effect on the purchasing power of the consumer when his or her income level changes.
In the given case, Natalie was price conscious and used to buy lower priced goods with the objective of saving money. When her income rises she starts buying expensive goods as her purchasing power increases with increase in income.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is A.
Answer:
13.86%
Explanation:
34% was invested into stock X with an expected return of 11%
22% was invested into stock Y with an expected return of 18%
44% was invested into stock Z with an expected return of 14%
The expected return on the portfolio can be calculated using the formula below
Expected return= Sum of ( weight of stock×return of stock)
= (0.34×11%)+(0.22×18%)+(0.44×14%)
= 3.74+3.96+6.16
= 13.86%
Hence the expected return on the portfolio is 13.86%
A problem in developing effective compensation for teams is that rewarding individuals erodes cohesiveness. Thus the first option is correct.
<h3>What is Cohesiveness?</h3>
Cohesiveness refers to the act or the property of togetherness. in the group , cohesiveness can be seen when the group performs the activity. It is important to have cohesiveness in every group for the accomplishment of the task.
When a individual in a group is provided a compensation it leads to dispute and chaos which erodes the cohesiveness of the group. Thus the first option is correct.
Learn more about Cohesiveness here:
brainly.com/question/13774781
#SPJ1
