Answer: The ultimate goal of the peer review process is that you can have others review and look over your work for things that are incorrect, need fixing, or need rewording. When we write things on our own, we sometimes make unconscious errors that we sometimes do not even catch in revision. Having a new set of eyes look at something helps to catch errors that we might miss. It is very similar to reading your work out load to catch errors, as reading something out loud is another effective strategy when reviewing your work.
Hi!
Questions that we cannot answer with science are going to be ones which are subjective, or, opinion related.
For example, could we follow the scientific method in order to successfully see that Mandy's favourite colour is 'blue' and her grandma's favourite food is 'pizza'?
Well... I... I guess, but... It doesn't make sense! These have nothing to do with science, as they are all just opinionated!
Hopefully, you get the picture. =)
The answer above is incorrect. The correct answer is James Watson accompanied by Francis Crick.
