Answer:
H0 ; μ ≤ 4 pCi/L
Ha ; μ > 4 pCi/L
The null hypothesis is that the concentration of dangerous, cancer-causing radon gas in her classroom is less than or equal to the safe level of 4pCi/L
H0 ; μ ≤ 4 pCi/L
The alternative hypothesis is that the concentration of dangerous, cancer-causing radon gas in her classroom is greater than the safe level of 4pCi/L.
Ha ; μ > 4 pCi/L
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis (H0) tries to show that no significant variation exists between variables or that a single variable is no different than its mean. While an alternative Hypothesis (Ha) attempt to prove that a new theory is true rather than the old one. That a variable is significantly different from the mean.
The null hypothesis is that the concentration of dangerous, cancer-causing radon gas in her classroom is less than or equal to the safe level of 4pCi/L
H0 ; μ ≤ 4 pCi/L
The alternative hypothesis is that the concentration of dangerous, cancer-causing radon gas in her classroom is greater than the safe level of 4pCi/L.
Ha ; μ > 4 pCi/L
Your answer would be (3, 4) is the solution to both lines A and B.
I would think that it would be the 3:8 one because if you do the math, 8-3 is 5 and 12-5 is 7. The only reason Im doing it this way is because its the only way I can set it up.
so you have more of a difference with the 12:5 one and less of a difference with the 3:8.
I hope I helped a bit
Answer: C) x = 2
2^{2x + 2} = 2^{3x}
Since both terms (above) have the same base, set the exponents to be equal:
2x + 2 = 3x (Rearrange to solve for x)
x = 2
∴ x = 2
