If the value of x is equal to a -6, does it make this inequality a true statement? -3-5x<-14
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
V =
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
B = ( multiply both sides by h )
Bh = 3V ( isolate V by dividing both sides by 3 )
= V
Answer:
3544
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a problem of compound growth. The formula is
Where F is the value in the future (in this case, the population after 13 years)
P is the intial amount (here, the initial population of 2000, so P = 2000)
r is the rate of growth (here, it is 4.5%, in decimal, 0.045)
t is the time frame (here, it is 13 years, so t = 13)
<em>we can plug the numbers into the formula and solve for F:</em>
<em></em>
<em>rounded to the nearest whole number, the </em><em>population after 13 years would be 3544</em>
Answer: There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of agenda-less meetings is greater than 45%.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
The p-value for this hypothesis test is 0.025.
The level of significance is α=0.05
As p-value< α ∵0.025< 0.05
[if p-value< α , we reject ]
then, we reject the null hypothesis.
i.e. We have sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Hence, the correct statement is : There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of agenda-less meetings is greater than 45%.
Check the picture below.
the ladder is 26ft, the roof is 24ft above, so the ladderis 2ft longer than needed, if you move the ladder 10 feet away, will it give 24 or more? well, you know already.
the ladder is 26ft, the roof is 24ft above, so the ladderis 2ft longer than needed, if you move the ladder 10 feet away, will it give 24 or more? well, you know already.