Construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the mean net change in LDL cholesterol after the garlic treatment. What does the confidence interval suggest about the effectiveness of garlic in reducing LDLcholesterol?
sample mean = x-bar = 4.7
ME = 1.96*15.6/sqrt(43) = 4.663
95% CI: 4.7 - 4.663 < u < 4.7 + 4.663
The value of
,
, and
for each schools is given in the first picture below.
is the lower quartile
is the median
is the upper quartile
School A:
Minimum value is 2
Maximum value is 22
The lower quartile is 2.5
The median is 10
The upper quartile is 15.5
School B:
Minimum value is 9
Maximum value is 20
The lower quartile is 12
The median is 16
The upper quartile is 18
The box plot for each school is shown in the second picture
Box plot for school A isn't symmetrical. The data tails on the right
Box plot for school B isn't symmetrical. The data tails on the left
Answer:
8/12 or about 66%
Step-by-step explanation:
Total movies = 12
Comedies = 4
8/12
here is your ans........option D.commodity money.......
Answer:
1. This is a "RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT".
A randomized controlled experiment is a type of research study, were the researcher randomly select samples in other not to be biased. This samples are separated into two groups, which are the experimental and the controlled group.
2. The research has a treatment group and a controlled group.
A treatment group are those group that received some special treatment from the researcher, it can also be called the experimental group. According to the research, the treatment group are those who are in the POVERTA scheme. That is the 320 communities.
A controlled group are those group that were not given any special treatment, but are , separated and studied. According to the research the controlled group are those 185 communities
3. This research provides evidence that being in a community receiving POVERTA benefits is associated with a lower rate of childhood illness. Because after two years, it was noticed the children in the community that receives POVERTA has low rate of illness, than the children in a community that doesn't receive the benefits of POVERTA.
4. This study does not provide evidence that being in a community receiving POVERTA benefits causes a lower rate of childhood illness. Because the research did not involve treatment of illnesses and they is no experimental evidence that shows that POVERTA benefits is interrelated with illness, as illness involves the internal functions of human body.
5. Such study will be called a "RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT". Because their randomly isolated themselves, and the POVERTA treatment was not given to them. The researcher was not based in selecting them not to participate.
