A bottle contains a label stating that it contains pills with 500 mg of vitamin C, and another bottle contains a label stating t
hat it contains pills with 325 mg of aspirin When testing claims about the mean contents of the pills, which would have more serious implications: rejection of the vitamin C claim or rejection of the aspirin claim? Is it wise to use the same significance level for hypothesis tests about the mean amount of vitamin C and the mean amount of aspirin? Rejection of the claim about________ is more serious because the wrong_________ dosage could cause more serious adverse reactions than a wrong_______dosage. It would be wise to use a__________ significance level for testing the claim about the aspirin.
Rejection of aspirin argument is more dangerous because the incorrect dosage of aspirin may cause more severe adverse reactions than the incorrect dosage of vitamin C. It would be prudent to use a lower level of significance to test the aspirin argument.
Suppose a pound of peanuts is priced at X, M&M is Y, and the equation is 6X+4Y=42.70 8X+5Y=55.27. [8X+5Y=55.27]*4-[6X+4Y=42.70]*5 is [32X+20Y=221.08] - [30X+20Y=213.5] X=3.79 Y=4.99
