Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:

Now we can find the second moment with this formula:

And replacing we got:

The variance would be given by:
![Var(X) =E(X^2) -[E(X)]^2 = 21.4 -[3.8]^2 = 6.96](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20Var%28X%29%20%3DE%28X%5E2%29%20-%5BE%28X%29%5D%5E2%20%3D%2021.4%20-%5B3.8%5D%5E2%20%3D%206.96)
And the deviation would be:

Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we have the following distribution given:
X 1 2 7
P(X) 1/5 2/5 2/5
We need to begin finding the mean with this formula:

And replacing we got:

Now we can find the second moment with this formula:

And replacing we got:

The variance would be given by:
![Var(X) =E(X^2) -[E(X)]^2 = 21.4 -[3.8]^2 = 6.96](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20Var%28X%29%20%3DE%28X%5E2%29%20-%5BE%28X%29%5D%5E2%20%3D%2021.4%20-%5B3.8%5D%5E2%20%3D%206.96)
And the deviation would be:

A. -1
(1,2) and (2,1)
slope = 2 -1 / 1 -2
slope = 1 / -1
slope = -1
Answer:
a) (0.5256,0.5944)
c) Criticism is invalid
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 560
Proportion of mislabeled = 56%

a) 90% Confidence interval:


Putting the values, we get:

b) Interpretation of confidence interval:
We are 90% confident that the true proportion of all seafood in the country that is mislabeled or misidentified is between 0.5256 and 0.5944 that is 52.56% and 59.44%.
c) Validity of criticism
Conditions for validity:

Verification:

Both the conditions are satisfied. This, the criticism is invalid.