Answer:Ruling Out Rival Hypotheses
Explanation:
Ruling Out Rival Hypotheses – There are times where one explanation is not enough to make conclusion and in this case there may be other explanation which may require that researchers do additional research to get rid of these other many explanations .Ruling out rival hypothesis: is then a principle which states that when there is a situation that we need to define or determine the question that one should ask is whether they have exhausted all other possible explanations regarding that issue in question.
is the power of the President of the United States and other members of the executive branch of the United States Government to resist certain subpoenas and other interventions by the legislative and judicial branches of government in pursuit of information or personnel relating to the executive.
According to statistic, there is around 17,000 Urban outlets for Every 5,000 Rural outlets.
Based on this , the approximate rato of <span>rural outlets to urban outlets would be:
5000 : 17000
5 : 17
1 : 3.4
Since it's just asking for approximate, we can round the ratio down into
1 : 3
</span>
<h2>I hope right the answers </h2><h2 />
The correct answer is letter C
Locke initially advocated the need for a centralized government structure that would prevent disorder within society. His conservative and authoritarian vision also extended to the field of religiosity, at a time when he believed that the monarch should interfere in the religious options of his subjects. However, his interest in the field of philosophy gradually changed his views.
One of the fundamental points of his political thought changed considerably when the intellectual began to question the legitimacy of the divine right of kings. The work that essentially deals with this subject is entitled “Two Treaties on Government” and was published in the late 17th century. In his views, Locke advocated the establishment of political practices that were not against the natural laws of the world.
In addition, this prominent thinker observed many of his interests in the political field being themed within his country when he witnessed important events regarding the English Revolution. In his view, a power that did not guarantee the right to property and the protection of life could not have the means to legitimize its exercise. Still in this regard, he clearly stated that a government that did not respect these rights should be legitimately deposed by the population.
