It would take the car about 6 hours. 368 divided by 64, which equals 5.75, if rounded, would be 6.
Here is your answer!
B) The determinent is 0
Answer:
The maximum height of the prism is 
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
x------> the height of the prism
we know that
the area of the rectangular base of the prism is equal to
so
-------> inequality A
------> equation B
-----> equation C
Substitute equation B in equation C
------> equation D
Substitute equation B and equation D in the inequality A
-------> using a graphing tool to solve the inequality
The solution for x is the interval---------->![[0,12]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B0%2C12%5D)
see the attached figure
but remember that
The width of the base must be 
meters less than the height of the prism
so
the solution for x is the interval ------> ![(9,12]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%289%2C12%5D)
The maximum height of the prism is
Answer:
Answers are below
Step-by-step explanation:
12) No because the scale factor is not the same between the two rectangles
13) Yes. TUV is congruent to XYZ. The scale factor is 3/4.
14) Yes. I used SAS to see whether or not the triangles were similar. PQR is congruent to UVW.
15) Yes. I used 14) Yes. I used SAS to see whether or not the triangles were similar. DGH is congruent to FEH.
Well if finding the area of a shape would be multiplying the 2 sides due to the given information that both shaded sides equal to 50, that means 50x50 which is 2500
