Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
Answer:
You haven't gave any data so I will just give you a couple reasons.
Explanation:
Drinking while driving as a teen is one of the most caused deaths for teens. Drinking while driving as a teen is not uncommon. Not many people are doing anything about it ether but that doesn't mean no one is doing anything.
B is answer because ewe have glands that produce hormones in our body.
Answer:
In the case of hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, estrogen drives cell cycle progression by binding to the ER, leading to its dimerization, translocation to the nucleus, and transcriptional activity at estrogen response elements (EREs) [13].
Explanation:
